Most Common Six Errors On Legal Interpretation In Ecuador
Abstract
The main purpose of this work is to correct the misconception prevailing in culture of the Ecuadorian legal interpretation of the law. For this, the author through constructive criticism, stated six misconceptions quite accepted by our lawyers, judges and public officials. Also develops an introductory study on the purpose of the interpretation of the law and its associated elements.
Downloads
References
Aristóteles. (s. IV a.C.). Etica Nicomaquea.
Bonnecase, J. (1945). Elementos de Derecho Civil (tomo I). México: Editorial José M. Cajica Jr.
Corte Suprema de Justicia, caso 149/97 (R.O. 137 de 25 de agosto de 1997).
Corte Suprema de Justicia, fallo 734-98 emitido por la Primera Sala de lo Civil y Mercantil (R.O. 103 de 7 de enero de 1999).
Corte Suprema de justicia, fallos publicados en la Gaceta Judicial Año XCV, Serie 16, numero 2, págs. 470 y ss.
Ducci Claro, C. (2006). Interpretación Jurídica. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
García Máynez, E. (2003). Introducción al Estudio del Derecho. México: Porrúa.
Linares Quintana, S. (1998). Tratado de Interpretación Constitucional. Buenos Aires: Abelado-Perrot.
Radbruch, G. (1974). Introducción a la Filosofía del Derecho (trad. Wenceslao Roces, 4a edición). Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Madrid.
Recaséns Siches, L. (1973). Nueva Filosofía de la interpretación. México DF: Porrúa.
Revista de Derecho y Jurisprudencia. Santiago de Chile.
Copyright (c) 2008 César Coronel Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).