To sow rights. Reconfiguration of the Argentine rural worker, as a subject of regional and universal right
Abstract
This paper analyzes the reform of rural labor in Argentina, from the theoretical debate linked to the reconfiguration of the worker as a subject of universal rights and the transformation of demos, opposite the supranational rules generated by the processes of regional integration and globalization.The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of this process, rules and institutionally by the degree of incorporation of international human rights standards in the national legislation related to the new regime of Argentine agricultural work.The structure of this analysis contains three sections. In the first, the theoretical debate on the transformation of citizenship, caused by the tension between national legislation and international rights, to rethink the extent influences the transformation of the legal status of the worker, the subject develops subject to national law to regional and universal right. The second will make a brief analysis of some supranational law which manifests the internationalization of the rights of workers. Finally, we discuss the strategic points of the last reform of the Argentine rural work, trying to analyze the main changes. The selected for the development of this proposed methodology consists of theoretical analysis of the transformation of demos and regulations for the new regime of Argentine farm work (National Law 26,727), which will be supplemented by referring to bodies of Latin American regional integration and International Treaties on Human Rights, specifically on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ESCR).
Downloads
References
Ackerman, B. (1998). We the people. Transformation, vol. 2. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Bendini, M., Radonich, M. & Steimberger, N. (1999). De golondrinas y otros migrantes. Buenos Aires: La Colmena.
Brebbia, F. & Malanos, N. (2007). Derecho agrario. Buenos Aires: Astrea.
Bustos Gisbert, R. (2005). La constitución red: Un estudio sobre supraestatalidad y constitución. Bilbao: Instituto Vasco de Educación Pública (IVAP).
Cascajo Castro, J.L. (2003). «Notas para un breve ensayo sobre constitución e interpretación constitucional». Estudios de Deusto, 51, 1. Tomado del sitio Web http://revista-estudios.deusto.es/index.php/estudios deusto/article/view/408/472 (consultado el 23-XI-2013).
Fabio F. & Neiman M. (2010). «Precariedad en los mercados de trabajo rurales. Agricultura y Familias en Valle de Uco». En Busso, M. & Perez, P. (eds.). La Corrosión del trabajo. Estudios sobre informalidad y precariedad laboral. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
Ferrajoli, L. (2003). «Pasado y futuro del estado de derecho». En Carbonell, M. (ed.), Neo constitucionalismo(s). Madrid: Trotta.
Garrido, C. y Peres, W. (1998). Grandes empresas y grupos industriales latinoamericanos. México, D.F: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Gonzáles Morales, F. (2013). Sistema interamericano de derechos humanos. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Groisman, F. (2012). «Salario mínimo y empleo en Argentina». Revista de economía política de Buenos Aires, año 6, vol. 11, pp. 9-47.
Haberle P. (2002). Pluralismo y Constitución. Estudios de teoría constitucional de la sociedad abierta. Madrid: Tecnos.
Habermas, J. (1997). «Replay to Grimm». En Gowan, P. & Andersen, P. (ed.), The question of Europe. Londres: Verso.
Mántaras, L. M. (2007). El trabajo en las explotaciones rurales y sus diferencias con el trabajo industrial. Santa Fe: Universidad Nacional del Litoral.
Neiman, G. (2001). Trabajo de campo. Producción, tecnología y empleo en el medio rural. Buenos Aires: CICCUS.
Neiman, G. & Quaranta, G. (2000). «Restructuración de la producción y flexibilidad funcional del trabajo agrícola en la Argentina». Tomado de http://relet.iesp.uerj.br/Relet_12/Relet_12.pdf (consultado el 28-XI-2013).
Rau, V. (2012). Cosechando yerba mate. Estructuras sociales de un mercado laboral agrario en el nordeste argentino. Buenos Aires: CICCUS.
Senyk, A. y Ruiz, Á. (2013). «La inspección laboral en el ámbito rural». Revista Derecho del Trabajo, I, 2. Tomado del sitio Web Infojus: DACF120145http://www.infojus.gov.ar/doctrina/dacf120145-ruiz-inspeccion_laboral_en_ambito.htm?1&bsrc=ci (consultado el 6-VI-2014).
Walker, N. (2002). «The idea of constitutional pluralism». Modern Law Review, 65, pp. 317-359.
Ward, I. (2001). «Beyond Constitutionalism: the search of european political imagination». European Law Journal, 7, 1, págs.24-40.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1997). «Does Europe need a Constitution? Reflections on demos, tales and ethosin the german Maastricht decision». En Gowan, P. & Andersen, P. (eds.), The question of Europe. Londres: Verso.
Copyright (c) 2014 Daniela Verónica Sánchez Enrique
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
