La justicia en la era del Covid-19 a través del prisma del poder judicial
Resumen
El trabajo está dedicado a identificar los principales problemas en el campo del principio de procedimiento judicial en el contexto de la pandemia Covid-19. La investigación usa los métodos formal legal, histórico y legal, análisis comparativo y modelización. El orden y los temas a considerar son los siguientes: en la primera sección, consideraremos los desafíos y amenazas a la justicia que surgieron durante la pandemia de Covid-19. En la segunda sección, se verá la experiencia judicial durante la pandemia en el contexto de los principios básicos del poder judicial. En la tercera sección, examinamos la aplicación de los principios organizativos y procesales del poder judicial durante la crisis de la pandemia. En la cuarta sección final, evaluaremos el papel de las instituciones judiciales internacionales y los organismos gubernamentales en la optimización de la administración de justicia en el contexto de la pandemia Covid-19. Como resultado del trabajo, enfatizando la vulnerabilidad del sistema judicial y los estándares de justicia, los autores apoyan la expansión del intercambio de experiencias y cooperación no solo a nivel estatal sino también a nivel de comunidades profesionales de jueces, en particular con los miembros y jueces de la Comisión Europea para la Eficacia de la Justicia, el Consejo Asesor de Jueces Europeos, y los tribunales europeos de derechos humanos.
Descargas
Citas
Boot, A., Carletti, E., Haselmann, R., Kotz, H. H., Krahnen, J. P., Pelizzon, L., Schaefer, S. & Subrahmanyam, M. (March 24, 2020). The coronavirus and financial stability. Vox. In https: //voxeu.org/content/coronavirus-and-financial-stability.
Bos, v. d. K., Velden, v. d. L. & Lind, E.A. (2014). On the Role of Perceived Procedural Justice in Citizens 'Reactions to Government Decisions and the Handling of Conflicts. Utrecht Law Review, 10(4), 1-26. In https: //www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.287.
Bosnia and Herzegovina. Constitutional Court. (2020). Decision АР 1217/20. In http://www.ustavnisud.ba/dokumenti/_en/AP-1217-20-1234093.pdf.
Brennan, D. (2020). Fines, jail time and sackings: what happens when people break coronavirus quarantines around the world. Newsweek. In https: //www.newsweek.com/fines-jail-time-sackingswhat-happens-people-break-coronavirus-quarantines-around-world-1492947.
Center on International Cooperation. (2020). Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies, Justice in a Pandemic—Briefing One: Justice for All and the Public Health Emergency. In https://www.justice.sdg16.plus/.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). What Law Enforcement Personnel Need to Know about Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19). In https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-law-enforcement.html.
Civicus. (2020). States should put human rights at the center of all responses to Covid-19. In https://www.civicus.org/index.php/media-resources/media-releases/4357-civicus-statesshould-put-human-rights-at-the-centre-of-all-responses-to-covid-19/.
Council of Europe. (2020). How should judges respond to the Covid-19 challenges and what lessons should they learn? Advisory Council of European Judges. In https://www.coe.int/ru/web/portal/Covid-19.
CrisisGroup. (2020). Covid-19andConflict: SevenTrends to Watch. In https://www.crisisgroup.org/global/sb4-Covid-19-and-conflictseven-trends-watch.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2020). Lessons Learned and Challenges Facing the Judiciary during and Beyond the Covid-19 Pandemic: Declaration. In https://rm.coe.int/cepej-declaration-on-lessons-learned-cepej-2020-8rev/16809ede8b.
European Union Advisory Mission to Ukraine (EUAM). (April 17, 2020). Justice in times of a pandemic, EU judges shared their practical experience with Ukrainian colleagues. In https://www.euam-ukraine.eu/ua/news/9479/.
Gaviria, P. (April 3, 2020). Police report jump in domestic violence cases amid coronavirus crisis. Komo News. In https://komonews.com/news/local/police-report-jump-in-domestic-violence-report-amid-coronavirus-crisis.
Gorodovenko, V. V. (2012). Principles of the Judiciary. Kharkiv: Right.
Graham-Harrison, E., Giuffrida, A., Smith H. & Ford, L. (March 28, 2020). Lockdowns around the world bring rise in domestic violence. The Guardian. In https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/28/lockdowns-world-rise-domestic-violence;
Guterres, A. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and human rights. United Nations. In https://www.un.org/ru/coronavirus/we-are-all-together-human-rights-and-Covid-19-response.
Kupchan, C. A. (April 2, 2020). Trump's Covid-19 lapse gives China an opening. CNN. In https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/02/opinions/trump-covid-china-charles-kupchan-opinion/index.html.
Legg, M. & Song, A. (2020). The courts and the pandemic: the role and limits of technology. LSJ Online. In https://lsj.com.au/articles/the-courts-and-the-pandemic-the-role-and-limits-of-technology/.
North, A. (March 26, 2020). When home is not safe: What the coronavirus pandemic means for domestic violence survivors. In https://www.vox.com/2020/3/26/21193814/coronavirus-domestic-violenceshelters-Covid-19-abuse;
Office of the High Commissioner. (2020). Urgent action needed to prevent Covid-19: rampaging through places of detention. In https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25745&LangID=E.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (March 2, 2020). Coronavirus: the world economy at risk. In https://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/.
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (1990). Copenhagen Meeting of the OSCE Human Dimension Conference. In https://www.oscepa.org/documents/election-observation/election-observation-reports/documents/1344-osce-copenhagen-document-1990-eng/file.
Republic of Macedonia. Constitutional Court. (2020). Decision U.no.44/2020 and U.no.50/2020. In http://ustavensud.mk/?p=19030.
Seregin, V. (2015). Rule of law: modern ideas about the essence and content of the constitutional principle. Legalitas. In http://legalitas.com.ua/ua/ukr-v-serogin-verxovenstvo-prava-suchasni-uyavlennya-pro-sutnist-ta-zmist-konstitucijnogo-principu/.
Travesi, F. (March 27, 2020). Justice in the Era of Covid-19: Our Global Responsibility. International Center for Transitional Justice. In https://www.ictj.org/news/justice-era-Covid-19-our-global-responsibility.
Ukraine. (2020). On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine aimed at providing additional social and economic guarantees in connection with the spread of coronavirus disease (Covid-19): Law 540. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/540-20#Text.
Ukraine. (2020). On amendments to the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine on the course of procedural timeframes during the quarantine established by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease (Covid-19): Law. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/731-20#Text.
Ukraine. Judicial Power. (June 4, 2020). Canadian and Ukrainian experiences in the administration of justice in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. In https://od.arbitr.gov.ua/sud5017/pres-centr/general/949472/.
Ukraine. Supreme Court. (2020). A webinar of the network of the highest courts of the ECHR on the administration of justice in a pandemic was held. In https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/968811/.
United Kingdom. (2020). Guideline PD51ZA. In https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/practice-direction-51za-extension-of-time-limits-and-clarification-of-practice-direction-51y-coronavirus.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
United Nations. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols n° 11 and 14. In https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf.
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx.
United Nations. (1985). Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. In https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/basic-principles-on-the-independence-of-the-judiciary/.
Williams, D. & Johnson, D. (2020). Covid-19: Litigation in the Time of a Pandemic. Dac Beachcroft. In https://www.dacbeachcroft.com/en/gb/articles/2020/march/Covid-19-litigation-in-the-time-of-a-pandemic-latest-updates/.
World Health Organization. (2020). Preparedness, prevention and control of Covid-19 in prisons and other places of detention: Interim guidance. In http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0019/434026/Preparedness-prevention-and-control-of-Covid-19-inprisons.pdf.
Derechos de autor 2021 Victor Gorodovenko, Oleksandr Bondar, Larysa Udovyka
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
1. Los autores conservan siempre los derechos de autor. A la vez, garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera en publicar su trabajo bajo una licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y del hecho que se ha publicado en esta revista.
2. Los autores saben y aceptan que el equipo de Ius Humani procurará darle a sus contribuciones la mayor difusión posible. Ello implica distribuir sus contenidos en la versión periódica impresa, en el sitio electrónico de la Revista, en diversas bases de datos y en índices científicos.
3. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
4. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).
