Is the Current System of Criminal Procedure of Iran Efficient?
Abstract
This paper is a study about the efficiency of the criminal system designed in the new Criminal Procedure Code of Iran, that came into effect on June 22, 2015. Notwithstanding the notable legislator’s efforts, infrastructural and structural reforms have not been carried out. Accordingly, it is not expected to be as efficient as the previous laws due to the lack of fundamental reforms; reforms caused the improvement in “low-level efficiency” (saving resources in the economic sense) rather than in the “high-level” one (saving resources plus developing more justice). The analysis of the efficiency of the Code and proposal of fundamental reforms for having a high-level efficient Criminal Law in Iran are the main objectives of this paper. After an introduction (Chapters I and II), we made a historical approach of the Iranian system in this matter (Chapter III). Then, we analyze three types of efficiency (Chapter IV), attending to some infrastructural elements, some structural factors and other procedural aspects. At last, we synthetize four conclusions (Chapter V). Main conclusion is that efficiency in the system of criminal procedure would be only on low-level.
Downloads
References
Austin, J. & Coventry, G. (2001). Emerging Issues on Privatized Prisons. Washington DC: United States Department of Justice (retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/181249.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Barr, N. (1998). The Economics of the Welfare State, 3rd ed. Stanford (California): Stanford University Press.
Cavaliere, A. & Scabrosetti, S. (2006). Privatization and Efficiency: From Principals and Agents to Political Economy. Nota di lavoro 99.2006. Pavia (Italy): Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=914476 in 2-II-2018).
Dam, K.W. (2006). Judiciary and Economic Development. Chicago: University of Chicago, Law School (retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200603dam.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer, A. (2002). Courts: The Lex Mundi Project. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8890 (retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w8890 in 2-II-2018).
Dubois, E., Schurrer, Ch. & Velicogna, M. (2013). The Functioning of Judicial Systems and The Situation of the Economy in the European Union Member States. Strasbourg: European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/effectivejustice/files/cepej_study_justice_scoreboard_en.pdf in 2-II-2018).
European Commission (2015). Annual Growth Survey 2016; Strengthening the Recovery and Fostering Convergence. Brussels (retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/2016/ags2016_annual_growth_survey.pdf in 2-II-2018)
House of Commons-Committee of Public Accounts. (2016). Efficiency in the Criminal Justice System. First Report of Session 2016-17. London: Committee of Public Accounts (retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubacc/72/72.pdf in 2-II-2018).
House of Commons-Constitutional Affairs Committee (2004). Judicial Appointments and a Supreme Court (Court of Final Appeal). First Report of Session 2003-04, vol. 1, London: The Stationery Office Limited (retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmconst/48/48.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Letwin, S.R. (2005). On the History of the Idea of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Najafi, M. & Faqih Khani, M. (2002). History of Political Developments in Iran. Tehran: Entesharat-e-Moassese-ye-Motaleat-e-Tarikh-e-Moaser-e-Iran (Institute of Contemporary History of Iran Studies Pub).
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2007). NASA/SP 6105. NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, Revision 1, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office (retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Niyazpour, A. (2011). Agreementualization in Criminal Proceedings. Tehran: Entesharat- Mizan pub.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). What makes civil justice effective? Economics Department Policy Notes, n° 18. Paris: OECD (retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/Civil%20Justice%20Policy%20Note.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Posner, A.R. (1985). An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review, 85(6), pp. 45-52.
Rayejiyan Asli, M. (2009). Criminal Law and Criminology in Conte Law Booklet. Majalleh-Tahghighat-e-Hoghoghi (Law Researches Review), 62, Shahid Beheshti University, pp. 189-197.
Research Center of Judiciary of Iran (2017). Detailed Study of Time of Handling Cases in Judicial Units of Iran. Tehran: Markaz-e-Entesharat-e-Ghovv-e-Ghazaiyy-e (Center of Publications of Judiciary).
Shams, A. (2003). Civil Procedure Law, vol. 1, 4th ed. Tehran: Entesharat-Mizan Pub.
Transparency International (2013). Corruption Perceptions Index (retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Transparency-International-Corruption-Perceptions-Index-2013/$FILE/EY-Transparency-International-Corruption-Perceptions-Index-2013.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Transparency International (2016). Corruption Perceptions Index (retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Transparency-International-Corruption-Perceptions-Index-2016/$FILE/EY-Transparency-International-Corruption-Perceptions-Index-2016.pdf in 2-II-2018).
Zarrini, H. & Hojabrian, H. (2009). The Contemporary History of Judicial System of Iran and Its Developments, vol. 1. Tehran: Entesharat-e- Rouznam-e- Rasmi (Official Newspaper Pub.).
Copyright (c) 2018 Mehdi Fazli, Jalaleddin Ghiasi, Mohammad Khalil Salehi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
