Ineffective replay action
Abstract
This research includes the study of the action of repetition, within the art. 11.9 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, it is noteworthy that the supreme law embodies the principle or right of the State to compensation for damage caused by servers public whose actions marked by intent or fraud have caused it. the absence of a specific and effective procedure through which the action of repetition, consequently achieving the corresponding executable statement is demanded, a situation that calls to approach new elements to the present process is verified. The current regulation of the action of repetition ensures that judges who know the causes can not rule on intent or gross negligence of officials or public servants, and the degree of responsibility for them, hence it is necessary to achieve effective determination responsible so he can answer for the compensation amounts derived from the domestic and international decisions when Ecuador must assume them, such a situation results in an economic loss to the exchequer and a perpetuation of impunity for the actions carried out irresponsibly by officials or public servants that may affect third.
Downloads
References
Arboleda, T. (2010). La Responsabilidad del Estado. Madrid: Cervantes.
Arguedas, J. (2012). Formación de una cultura nacional indoamericana. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.
Carreras, D. (2010). Derechos propios del Estado. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Santa María de Chile.
Castillo, R. (2012). El servidor público español. Madrid: Cervantes.
Delgado, E. (2011). La indemnización como derecho universal. Caracas: Macmillan.
Delgado, F. (2014). Funciones y funcionarios del Estado. Zaragoza: Océano.
Espinoza, L. (2012). Funcionamiento de la Administración Pública. Ciudad de México: Azteca.
Estrada, R. (2010). Responsabilidad del Estado. Madrid: Zabalia.
Ferrero, M. (2010). Historia evolutiva del derecho. Puerto Barrios: Editorial Oscar de León Palacios.
Fiorini, B. (2009). Relación entre los actos de autoridad y la responsabilidad parcial del Estado. Buenos Aires: Palermo.
Guerrero, J. (2012). La responsabilidad Extracontractual del Estado. Ciudad de México: Trillas.
Gutiérrez, C. (2008). Los derechos humanos y las responsabilidades del Estado. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Palermo.
Hidalgo, M. (2008). Apuntes de Derecho Administrativo ecuatoriano: Teoría y Práctica. Quito: País.
Linares, J. (2010). La responsabilidad civil del empleado público. Ciudad de México: Estudios legales.
Marín, M. (2010). Fundamentos del cosntitucionalismo. Manizales: Universidad de Caldas: Ciencias Jurídicas.
Marin, M. (2011). La indemnización por daños y perjuicios. Universidad de Caldas: Manizales.
Mariño, T. (2011). El derecho administrativo. Bogotá: Patria.
Padilla, A. (2012). La Responsabilidad del Estado. Madrid: Océano.
Portillo, L. (2013). Organización política de la Cultura Hindú. Barcelona: Gran Angular.
Rivera, G. (2010). Derecho de reparación integral. Montevideo: Caspilla.
Rodríguez, A. (2011). Perpectivas de las mutualistas en latinoamerica. Santiago de Chile: Sociedad.
Salgado, J. (2010). Los derechos indemnizables y su compensación. Aconcagua: Océano.
Sánchez, P. (2011). La responsabilidad contractual del Estado. Quito: Colap.
Toledo, J. (2011). Pensamiento político de la antigüedad a la modernidad. Buenos Aires: Ceal.
Vallejo, R. (2013). La responsabilidad del servidor público. Ciudad de México: Trillas.
Vonlineur, L. (2014). Sistemas Mutuales. Paris: Rouge Mark.
Zanovini, G. (2010). Derecho Administrativo. Ciudad de México: Azteca.
Copyright (c) 2017 Guillermo Enríquez Burbano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
