The Relation Between Morality And Law In “Paleopositivism” And Ius Positivism
Contributions To A Chronicle
Abstract
In this paper, a historical chronicle of relations between morality and law´s done, as they have been conceived by legal positivists, since Austin´s developments until Hart´s propositions; most of them have been put forth since 1960, in the middle of XX Century. It is interesting note that, from a position that deny any possibility of a metaphysics, in which a value-neutrality was postulated, as it happened with Austin´s and Kelsen´s thesis, then was developed the idea that a link between morality and law is not only possible, but even necessary. The author has come to the conclusion that last Hart´s admission of a “soft” positivismo including a certain moral idea has made possible to obtain a stream of fresh air for the general theory of law and one contribution for the protection of the human rights. This has let a true advance in contemporary juridical ideas development.
Downloads
References
Atienza, M. (2001). El sentido del derecho. Barcelona: Ariel.
Austin, J. (2002). El objeto de la jurisprudencia, Madrid: Centro de estudios constitucionales
Bobbio, N. (1993). El positivismo jurídico. Madrid: Debate.
Comité Wolfenden (septiembre de 1957). Las citas corresponden a Devlin, P., 2010.
Devlin, P. (2010). La imposición de la moral. Madrid: Dykinson.
Dworkin, R. (1984). Los derechos en serio. Barcelona: Ariel.
Etcheverry, J.B. (2006). El debate sobre el positivismo jurídico incluyente. Un estado de la cuestión. México: UNAM.
Hart, H.L.A. (1963). El concepto de derecho, trad. Genaro Carrió. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.
Hart, H.L.A. (1994). The Concept of Law, 2a ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. El postcritum ha sido traducido por F. Mora Sifuentes (2010). Un intento de caracterización del positivismo jurídico incluyente. Papeles de Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho, 9, 1-14.
Hart, H.L.A. (1980a). El nuevo desafío del positivismo jurídico, trad. de L. Hierro, F. Laporta & J.R. Páramo. Sistema, 36, 3-18.
Hart, H.L.A. (1980b). Inmoralidad y alta traición. Filosofía del Derecho. R. Dworkin (ed.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Kelsen, H. (1958). Teoría general del Derecho y del Estado. México: UNAM.
Kelsen, H. (1979). Teoría pura del derecho, trad. por Roberto J. Vernengo. México: UNAM.
Lyons, D. (1986). Ética y Derecho. Barcelona: Ariel.
Massini Correas, C.I. (1995). La falacia de la falacia naturalista. Mendoza: Edium.
Montejano, B. (2002). Curso de derecho natural. Buenos Aries: LexisNexis.
Portela, J.G. (2010). Aportaciones de las teorías del lenguaje a la argumentación jurídica. AA.VV., Argumentos de la argumentación jurídica. México: Porrúa.
Portela, J.G. (2011). Derecho, desobediencia civil y principios jurídicos. Lima: Ara Editores.
Ridall, J.G. (1999). Teoría del Derecho, Gedisa Editorial. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Ross, A. (1974). Sobre el derecho y la justicia. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
Sampay, A.E. (1975). La filosofía jurídica del Artículo 19 de la Constitución Nacional. Buenos Aires: Cooperadora de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales.
Wolf, N. (23-III-2014). Contra los gays y contra los que piensan distinto. Buenos Aires: Diario Clarín.
Copyright (c) 2014 Jorge Guillermo Portela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
