Legal-Literary Explorations: Approaches to the Representation of Law in Literature.
Abstract
This article investigates the possible approaches between law and literature, exploring how legal analysis can be enriched through literary narratives. Although the boundaries between law and literature are clear, the research focuses on how literary works offer insights into freedom, justice, and law. It examines how law is represented in literature and how these representations contribute to a deeper understanding of fundamental legal concepts.
The article is structured into four sections. First, it examines the insularity of law and the lack of progress in interdisciplinary studies, which affect legal education and reinforce legal positivism. The second section explores the possible relationships between law and literature, analyzing how different authors have addressed legal themes in their works. The third section addresses the interpretations and theoretical complexities of the interdisciplinary approach, promoting a dialogue between various schools of thought. Finally, the fourth section presents legal dimensions in literature, in a quest to operationalize the proposed interdisciplinary categories. The main conclusion of the article is that the integration of literature into the study of law provides a platform to explore and challenge legal conventions. This interdisciplinary approach enriches both legal science and literary studies, providing a more comprehensive and critical understanding of legal phenomena. By combining legal and literary analyses, the development of law as a dynamic and progressive discipline is advanced, better equipped to respond to contemporary challenges.
Downloads
References
Bernárdez, E. (1982). Introducción a la lingüística. Espasa-Calpe.
Botero, A. (2008). Un nuevo modelo para armar. Instrucciones de uso. En Derecho y Literatura: contribuciones a una teoría literaria del derecho (pp. 29-40). Universidad Industrial de Santander.
Brooks, C. (1947). The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Coaguila, J. (2004). Teoría narrativa del derecho. UCSM.
Dickens, C. (1853). Bleak House. Bradbury & Evans.
Donato, Ó. M., & Nosetto, L. (2014). Leo Strauss: de Nietzsche a Platón. Entre Escila y Caribdis. Universidad Libre.
Dworkin, R. (1985). A Matter of Principle. Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1998). Cómo el derecho se parece a la literatura. En H. L. A. Hart & R. Dworkin (eds.), La decisión judicial (pp. 143-180). Siglo de Hombres Editores.
Eagleton, T. (2012). Una introducción a la teoría literaria. FCE.
Fish, S. (1982). Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in Law and Literature. Texas Law Review, 60, 551-568.
Fitzgerald, F. S. (1925). The Great Gatsby. Charles Scribner's Sons.
Häberle, P. (2000). Teoría de la constitución como ciencia de la cultura (trad. e introd. de E. Mikunda). Tecnos.
Häberle, P., & López Bofilly, H. (2004). Poesía y derecho constitucional: una conversación. Fundació Carles Pi i Sunyer d'Estudis Autonòmics i Socials.
Hervada, J. (1992). Lecciones propedéuticas de filosofía del derecho. EUNSA.
Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in Interpretation. Yale University Press.
Huamán, M. A. (2001). Algunas tesis equivocadas sobre la Teoría Literaria. Problemas de teoría literaria. Signo Lotófago.
Hugo, V. (1862). Les Misérables. A. Lacroix, Verboeckhoven & Cie.
Kesey, K. (1962). One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Viking Press.
Lee, H. (1960). To Kill a Mockingbird. J.B. Lippincott & Co.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). Justicia poética: la imaginación literaria y la vida pública (trad. C. Gardini). Editorial Andrés Bello.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Beacon Press.
Ollero, A. (1993). La crisis del positivismo jurídico (Paradojas teóricas de una rutina práctica). Persona y Derecho, Navarra, 28, 209-255. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.32243
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. Secker & Warburg.
Ost, F. (1999). Sobre la ciencia del derecho. En J. F. Palomino Manchego, Discusión sobre el Carácter Anticientífico del Derecho: (de Kirchmann a la discusión epistemológica actual) (pp. 248-250). España, Grijley.
Ost, F. (2006). El reflejo del derecho en la literatura. DOXA, Alicante, 29, 335.
Posner, R. (2000). Law and Literature. Harvard UP.
Puzo, M. (1969). The Godfather. G.P. Putnam's Sons.
Taminiaux, J. (1997). El legado de Platón en las interpretaciones filosóficas alemanas de la tragedia griega. Areté, Revista de Filosofía, IX(1), 131.
Zolezzi, L. (2013). Derecho y Literatura: aspectos teóricos. Derecho PUCP, 70, 391-406. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201301.018.
Copyright (c) 2024 José Mario Azalde León, Ruth Melina Rivera Cáceres
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).