Bioethics and Biolegal: ways to fully reconcile human beings
Abstract
Although Bioethics was born in a context of biomedical research and the practice of health sciences, it was not its only course: VR. Potter proposed a global bioethics, where the environment should also be the protagonist. And if one of the tasks that Bioethics has had since its origins is to return to the practice of medicine the human component that biotechnological developments threaten to take away, Bioethics must also serve to reconcile the human being with himself, with others and with the environment of which it is a part, since it intervenes and modifies it with a negative balance for nature. Another main task of Bioethics is to contribute to recognizing the value of human life and strengthening a culture of life, which armed conflicts and economic interests seek to make disappear. To achieve these objectives, a convenient biolegal support is necessary, of which the legislative bodies are especially guarantors, who have a precise and clear responsibility to legislate in accordance with the Political Constitution of the States. It is important and essential that new generations acquire, from an early age, concepts, habits and attitudes that guarantee a wisdom of life that is reflected in everyday life, where goods, virtues and norms are articulated that guarantee human coexistence and the consolidation of societies. fair, supportive and truly free.
Downloads
References
Alvira, R., Gallego, J.A., & Rueda, G. (2022). Qué aporta la muerte a la vida: perspectiva interdisciplinar. Ideas y Libros Ediciones.
Andorno, R. (2019). La dignidad humana como principio biojurídico y como estándar moral de la relación médico-paciente. Arbor, 195(792), 501. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.792n2002
Ayllón, J.R. (2019). El mundo de las ideologías. Homo Legens.
Beck, U. (1998). ¿Qué es la Globalización? Paidós.
Bermeo, E. (2021). La vida humana desde la antropología del personalismo integral y la bioética personalista de Elio Sgreccia. Quién: revista de Filosofía Personalista 13, 7-25.
Carvajal, J. (2007). El desarrollo del pensamiento moderno: la filosofía de la naturaleza de Descartes. Ed. UPB.
Ciccone, L. (2005). Bioética. Historia. Principios. Cuestiones. Ed. Palabra.
Corazón, R. (2019). El hombre en la antropología trascendental de Leonardo Polo. Studia Poliana, 21, 29-53. https://doi.org/10.15581/013.21.29-53
Cortés, A. (2007). El hombre-en-el-mundo y lo gestell heideggeriano en las redes de las nuevas tecnologías. Rev. Escritos, 34, 101.
Diéguez, A. (2017). Transhumanismo. La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano. Herder.
Eissa, M., El-Sherbiny, M., & Ibrahim, A. (2019). Biochemical and Histopathological studies on female and male Wistar rats fed on genetically modified soybean meals (Roundup Ready). JoBAZ, 80, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-019-0114-2
Elbaba, J. S. (2023). Investigación y bioética. Methodo Investigación Aplicada a las Ciencias Biológicas, 8(1), 1-2.
Gamboa-Bernal, G. (2016). Justo Alfonso: maestro íntegro e integral. En S. L. Díaz (ed.), Enciclopedia Alfonsina. Así en los árboles como en las aves (pp. 37-53). Ed. UPTC.
Gamboa-Bernal, G. (2016). La familia: un desafío para el futuro de nuestra Tierra. Cuadernos de Bioética, 27(3), 391-402.
Gamboa-Bernal, G. (2017). How to Progress from Opinion to Rationality: The Role of Philosophy as the Foundation of Bioethics. Anthropol, 5, 193. 10.4172/2332-0915.1000193.
Gamboa-Bernal, G. (2019). Da Vinci, 500 años después: del humanismo a la humanización. Persona y Bioética, 23(2), 171-179.
Gamboa-Bernal, G.A. (2023). Eutanasia: falacia de morir con dignidad. Ed. NUN.
García-Cardona, G. (2015). La dignidad de la persona humana. Horizonte de fundamentación teórica y práctica de la bioética. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 7(13), 006-011.
García-Márquez, G. (1995). La proclama. Por un país al alcance de los niños. En Colombia: al filo de la oportunidad. Tomo I (pp. 24-28). Colciencias- Tercer Mundo Ed.
Germán-Zurriaráin, R. (2017). Vulneraciones de la dignidad humana al final de la vida. Cuadernos de Bioética, 28(1), 83-97.
González, G. (coord.). (1999). Derechos humanos. La condición humana en la sociedad tecnológica. Tecnos.
González, R. (2019). The Constitutionalization of Biolaw in Colombia. En E. Valdés y J. Lecaros, Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 213-223). Springer.
Greenberg, S.S. (2019). Science for sale: The perils, rewards, and delusions of campus capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
Grimaux, G., & Páez, G. (2022). Conducta médica frente al diagnóstico prenatal de trisomía 18: ¿se aproxima un cambio de paradigma? Persona y Bioética, 26(2), e2626.
Guerra-López, R. (2013). Bioética y racionalidad. El personalismo al servicio de la ampliación del horizonte de la razón en la fundamentación bioética. Cuadernos de Bioética, 24(1), 39-48.
Henao-Hidrón, J. (2021). Constitución Política comentada. Ed. Temis.
Herrera-Jaramillo, F. J. (1999). El derecho a la vida y el aborto. Ed. Universidad del Rosario.
Hervada, J. (1982). Introducción crítica al derecho natural. Eunsa.
Hoces, P., & Ñique, C. (2021). Procreación natural versus ectogénesis. Persona y Bioética, 25(2), e2523.
Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2021). Hacia nuevos derechos humanos en la era de la neurociencia y la neurotecnología. Análisis filosófico, 41(1), 141-186.
Kernick, D. (2018). Models, metaphors and paradigms making sense of the world and the road to complexity. En Complexity and Healthcare Organization. A View from the Street (pp. 2-12). CRC Press.
Lee, C., Park, G., & Kang, J. (2018). The impact of convergence between science and technology on innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 522-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9480-9
Lira, E. (2021). Recognition, Reparation, Justice, and Memory: Chile 1990–2020. En W. López y L.K. Taylor, Transitioning to Peace (pp. 13-28). Springer.
Llano, F., García, D., & Villegas, C. (2019). Transhumanismo y Derecho: frente a frente. Carta a los editores. Ius et Scientia, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.12795/IESTSCIENTIA.2019.i01.01
Lukac de Stier, M. L. (2019). La dignidad humana como fundamento de una Bioética global. Vida y Ética, 20(1), 39-50.
Marco, A. (2018). Bases filosóficas para una crítica al transhumanismo. ArtefaCToS, 7, 107-125. https://doi.org/10.14201/art201872107125.
Mazzanti-Di, M. (2006). “Formar" mentes bioéticas", una alternativa metodológica de formación de docentes y estudiantes en bioética a través del programa escolar deficiencias naturales”. Pers Bioét., 10(2), 46-81.
Mullet, E., López, W., & Pineda, C. (2021). Forgiveness and Reconciliation in Post-Conflict Settings. En W. López y L. K. Taylor (eds.), Transitioning to Peace (pp. 67-90). Springer.
Nubiola, J. (2002). La búsqueda de la verdad. Humanidades, 2(1), 23-65.
Olano-García, H. (2016). Hablemos del derecho a la vida. Ius Humani Law Journal, 5, 209-216. https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v5i0.111
Paglia, V. (2019). Los desafíos de la cultura de la vida. Ecclesia, 33(2), 157-165.
Paz, O. (1990). La otra voz. Poesía y fin de siglo. Seix Barral.
Peltier-Bonneau, L., & Szwarcberg, M. (2019). Transformación de las emociones en las víctimas del conflicto armado para la reconciliación en Colombia. Desafíos, 31(2), 197-229. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7283
Peters, M.A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2022). Biodigital philosophy, technological convergence, and postdigital knowledge ecologies. En P. Michael, P. Jandrić y S. Hayes (eds.), Bioinformational philosophy and postdigital knowledge ecologies (pp. 3-22). Springer International Publishing.
Polo, L. (2021). Itinerario hacia la antropología trascendental I. Eunsa.
Potter, V.R. (1970). The science of survival. Rev. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 14, 127-153.
Ratzinger, J. (1985). Informe sobre la fe. BAC.
Richie, C. (2022). Introduction. What is Global Bioethics in the 21st Century? Global Bioethics, 33, 1-3. 10.1080/11287462.2021.2011000
Rodríguez-Becerra, M. (1994). Memoria del primer ministro del Medio ambiente Tomo I. En Inderena, el gran pionero de la gestión ambiental en Colombia (pp. 93-98). Ministerio del Medio ambiente.
Rodríguez-Becerra, M. (2004). El Código de los Recursos Naturales Renovables y del Medio Ambiente: el conservacionismo utilitarista y el ambientalismo. En Evaluación y Perspectivas del Código Nacional de Recursos Naturales de Colombia en sus 30 años de vigencia (pp. 155-177). Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Romeo-Casabona, C. M., & Romeo-Malanda, S. (2019). Approach to Biolaw as an Autonomous Juridical Discipline. En E. Valdés y J. Lecaros, Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 59-76). Springer.
Simó, Á., & Ortuño, P. (2021). La Construcción del Yo y la Cosmética Psicoquímica. En L. Baigorri y P. Ortuño, Cuerpos conectados: arte, identidad y autorrepresentación en la sociedad transmedia (pp. 89-95). Torrossa.
Sulmasy, D.P. (2007). Human Dignity and Human Worth. En J. Malpas y N. Lickiss, Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation (pp. 9-18). Springer, 2007.
Supreme Court of the United States. (1973). Justia. Doe v. Bolton, 410 U. S. 179. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/179/
Supreme Court of the United States. (2005). González v. Oregón. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2005/04-623.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (2015). Obergefell v. Hodges. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (2019b). Azar, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Allina Health Services et al. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1484_4f57.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (2019b). Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders, et al. 18-364 v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, et al. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-364_08m1.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (2020). June Medical Services L. L. C. et al. v. Russo, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1323_c07d.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (2021). Weisberg T. ‘Anything’s on the table’: Missouri legislature may revisit contraceptive limits post-Roe. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/urls_cited/ot2021/19-1392/19-1392-11.pdf
Supreme Court of the United States. (2022). Dobbs, state health officer of the Mississippi department of health, et al. V. Jackson women’s health organization et al. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf.
Supreme Court of the United States. (2022b). Kennedy v. Bremerton School District. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf
Talavera, P. (2014). Economicism and Nihilism in the Eclipse of Humanis. Humanities, 3 (3), 340-378. https://doi.org/10.3390/h3030340
Testart, J., & Rousseaux, A. (2018). Au péril de l'humain - Les promesses suicidaires des transhumanistes. Le Seuil.
U.S. Constitutional Amendments. (2022). FindLaw. https://constitution.findlaw.com/amendments.html#f6
U.S. Department of State. “The First Amendment to the United States Constitution”, 2020. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SPA-Constiution.pdf
Valdés, E. (2019). Towards a New Conception of Biolaw. En E. Valdés y J. Lecaros, Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 41-58). Springer.
Vattimo, G. (2020). Alrededores del ser. Galaxia Gutenberg.
Vujović, R. (2021). Mandatory immunization of children and protection of the right to life, health and bodily integrity. En Yearbook Human Right Protection Right to life (pp. 567-583). Vojvodina.
Wade, N.G., & Tittler, M.V. (2019). Psychological interventions to promote forgiveness of others: Review of empirical evidence. En Worthington, E. L Jr. y Wade, N. G., Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 255-265), Routledge.
Yacarini, A. E. (2020). La bioética personalista en la formación universitaria: el aporte científico de Elio Sgreccia. Vida y Ética, 20(2), 81-88.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gilberto Alfonso Gamboa-Bernal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
