On the Universality of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Abstract
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UNO, 1948) took place very shortly after the end of the Second World War and therefore emerged in a context that we associate with the dawn of the so-called Cold War. Almost seventy-five years after that date, the changes, often disruptive, have come on the back of what is known as the Digital Revolution, also called the Third Industrial Revolution or the Scientific and Technological Revolution, which includes the all-encompassing phenomenon of Globalisation. The universalisation of human rights may collide with other relativistic visions, such as interculturality or multiculturalism, for example. The commonly asserted characteristics of human rights, i.e. that they are objective, absolute and unalienable, may not be conclusive. The note of diversity disseminated by bodies such as UNESCO makes this clear: the celebration of the World Day for Cultural Diversity for Dialogue and Development, organised by UNESCO every 21 May, highlights, in this sense, not only the richness of the world's cultures but also the essential role of intercultural dialogue in achieving peace and sustainable development without detracting from its economic value. In this context, how can we reconcile universality and diversity? And without abandoning the tolerance-dignity binomial, let us continue to ask ourselves whether the universality that is being proclaimed is intended to impose a markedly Western worldview.
Downloads
References
Bernard, H. (1978). La barbarie con rostro humano. Monte Ávila.
Reina-Valera, (1960) Romanos 4:17. Sociedades Bíblicas en América Latina
Bueno Ochoa, L. (2020). Los derechos humanos en la era de los robots. En J. Pinto y Á. Sánchez de la Torre (Eds.), Los derechos humanos en el siglo XXI: en la conmemoración del 70 aniversario de la Declaración, Tomo IV, pp. 45-50. Edisofer.
Clavero, B. (2014). Derecho global. Por una historia verosímil de los derechos humanos. Trotta.
Ferrajolli, L. (1999). Derechos y garantías: la ley del más débil. Trotta.
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahuamnis, and New Materialisms. Differences and Relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26-32.
Fórum de Monterrey (2007). Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos Emergentes. https://www2.world-governance.org/IMG/pdf_ DUDHE.pdf
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The Nacional Interest, 16 (Summer 1989), 3-18.
Fundación José Saramago (2017). Carta Universal de Derechos y Obligaciones de las personas. https://www.josesaramago.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ES-declaracao_deveres_humanos_paginada-1.pdf
Garzón Valdés, E. & De Lucas, J (2001). Filosofía, política, derecho. Escritos seleccionados. Universitat de València.
Gutiérrez-Suárez, F. (2011). Universalidad de los derechos humanos. Una revisión a sus críticas. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Carlos III.] https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/11457
Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, pp. 172-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280
Hierro, J. (1998). Cuaderno de Nueva York. Hiperión.
Huntington, S. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72 (3) (Summer 1993), 22-49.
De Lucas-Martín, F. (1996). Puertas que se cierran: Europa como fortaleza. Icaria.
Lyotard, J. (1987). La condición postmoderna: informe sobre el saber. Cátedra.
Macintyre, A. (1987). Tras la virtud, trad. de Amelia Valcárcel. Grijalbo.
Nino, C. (1989). Ética y derechos humanos. Un ensayo de fundamentación. Ariel.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (1948). Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. https://www.un.org/es/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2018). Informe de la Relatora Especial sobre los derechos culturales. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N18/237/68/PDF/N1823768.pdf?OpenElement
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (2001) Declaración Universal sobre Diversidad Cultural. https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/universal-declaration-cultural-diversity
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (1998). Declaración de Responsabilidades y Deberes Humanos. https://web.archive.org/web/20100403111620/http://www.cic.gva.es/images/stories/declaracion_de_valencia.pdf
Peces-Barba, G., Asís, R., Fernández, C. y Llamas, A. (1995). Curso de derechos fundamentales (I). Teoría general. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III y Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE).
Pérez-Luño, A. (1998). La universalidad de los derechos humanos. Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho, 15, 95-110.
Pessoa, F. (2013). Libro del desasosiego. Acantilado.
Rubio, J (2001). Problemas en la universalización de los derechos humanos. Diálogo Filosófico, 51, 427-454.
Santos, B. (2002). Hacia una concepción multicultural de los derechos humanos. El Otro Derecho, 28, 59-83.
Sen, A. (2000). Democracia y desarrollo. Derechos del hombre y diferencias culturales. Anuario de Derechos Humanos, 1, pp. 367-386.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
