Written Law and Interpretation, According to Gény
Abstract
The objective of this article is to understand the relationship between written law and the interpretation of the terms proposed by François Gény, taking into account his description of the interpretive phenomenon and the elements of its rationality. This paper is strictly referred to his work titled “Method of Interpretation and Sources in Positive Private Law”, from which we establish the notions of law, interpretation, and rationality that the author developed, as well as his main ideas on extensive interpretation, analogy, the logical rules and the cases in which the elements extrinsic to the written law that can be considered in the practice of interpretation. We will finish by considering some references by the author to the method of free scientific research, such as his reflections on the limits of the interpretation dissociated from the will of the legislator. This article responds to a theoretical investigation, whose source is printed texts, therefore the methodology used required analytical synthetic and historical-logical methods. As a content analysis method, the textual analysis of the documents considered in the research has been used.
Downloads
References
Ecuador (2002). Decreto Ejecutivo 2428 de la Presidencia de la República. Estatuto del Régimen Jurídico Administrativo de la Función Ejecutiva. Registro Oficial No. 536, de 18 de marzo de 2002.
Ecuador (2005). Ley 2005-010. Codificación del Código Civil. Registro Oficial No. 46, de 24 de junio de 2005.
Ecuador (2008). Constitución de la República. Registro Oficial No. 449, de 20 de octubre de 2008.
Ecuador (2009). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. Registro Oficial No. 52, de 22 de octubre de 2009.
España (1974). Decreto 1836/1974. Texto articulado de la Ley 3/1973, de 17 de marzo, de Bases para la Modificación del Título Preliminar del Código Civil. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 163, de 9 de julio de 1974.
Estados Unidos (1912). Sentencia 222 U.S. 513 de la Corte Suprema de Justicia.
Fenet, P. A. (1836). Recueil complet des travaux préparatoires du Code Civil. Videcoq.
Gény, F. (1925). Método de interpretación y fuentes en derecho privado positivo (R. Saleilles, trad.). Reus.
González, E. (1997). La interpretación de las normas tributarias. Arazandi.
Guzmán, A. (1981). Historia del “referimiento legislativo”. Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos, 6, 13-76.
Halpérin, J. L. (2017). Exégesis (escuela) (A. Botero Bernal, trad.). Revista de Derecho de la Universidad del Norte, 48, 263-277.
Justiniano (1889). Cuerpo del Derecho Civil Romano (I. L. García del Corral, trad.). Jaime Molinas Editor.
Kelsen, H. (2013). Teoría Pura del Derecho (R. J. Vernengo, trad.). Porrúa.
Larrea, J., y Merino, R. (2004). Derecho Civil del Ecuador (XI). Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones.
Montesquieu, C. S. (2002). El espíritu de las leyes (D. Castro Alfín, trad.). Istmo.
Riofrío Martínez-Villalba, J. C. (2004). La prueba electrónica. Temis.
Tarello, G. (2018). La interpretación de la ley. Palestra.
Vernengo, R. (1994). La interpretación literal de la Ley. Abelardo-Perrot.
Copyright (c) 2021 Gastón Alexander Velásquez Villamar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).
