Ensuring a Balance Between Public and Private Interests in the Implementation of Quarantine Measures
Abstract
Under the influence of the spread of coronavirus infection, the world community has faced difficult challenges that provoke changes in the seemingly already stabilized legal regulation, putting at risk the settlement of human rights and the common good. The study aims to find effective mechanisms for balancing human rights and public interests in the context of their legal regulation. Specifically, this study is focused on the mechanisms of balancing private and public interests in the implementation of quarantine measures in the Covid-19 pandemic. The research methods were both general scientific and special methods, in particular: formal legal, historical and legal, analysis and synthesis. To perform the tasks of the work, the following structure was used: after some initial precisions, there are provided some considerations about the fiscal stimulus measures and about the exercise of the right of derogation; then, the study deals with the problem of lawmaking in a pandemic; and finally it is considered the threats to intellectual property in the sphere of healthcare. The results of the work show that the pandemic has seriously hit the balance between private and public interests. The public interests of the government and society have become a priority, but in many cases, the measures that infringe private interests are disproportionate, untimely and inefficient.
Downloads
References
Barnes, J. (2018). An Expanding Frontier of Administrative Law: The Public Life of Private Actors. European Public Law, 24(3), 595-612. In https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European+Public+Law/24.3/EURO2018033.
Buletsa, S. B. (April 23, 2020). Features of the contract of controlled access in the conditions of Covid-19. All-Ukrainian scientific and practical online conference. Odesa: Phoenix. In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/12616.
Chepis, O. I. (April 23, 2020). Ensuring the balance of interests of right holders and society in the application of compulsory licensing in the conditions of Covid-19. All-Ukrainian scientific and practical online conference. Odesa: Phoenix. In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/12616.
Chervonenko, V. (May 6, 2020). Quarantine in Ukraine: do the new prohibitions contradict the Constitution? BBC Ukraine. In https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-52186556?fbclid=IwAR2jl3JoswoV4BgILi6cHwwckdEBA3wW-cWEAs3j0mZQhohLqwpT7aW6IJw.
Comparato, G. (2017). Public Policy through Private Law: Introduction to a debate on European Regulatory Private Law. European Public Law, 22(5), 621-626. DOI 10.1111/eulj.12199.
Council of Europe. (1963). Protocol n° 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c.
Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Derogation in time of emergency. In https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/FS_Derogation_ ENG.pdf.
Fedorov, V., Kravchenko, S., Reznichenko, H., Opara, N. & Tsybokhin, O. (2020). Theoretical Problems of Legal Regulation of Innovations in the Medical Field: Experience in Counteracting Covid-19. Ius Humani. Law Journal, 9(2), 251-289. DOI 10.31207/ih.v9i2.254
Ferrario, A. & Kanavos, P. (2013). Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals: the European experience. Brussels: EMiNet. 2013. In http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/50513/.
Finnis, J. (2011). Natural Law and Natural Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gabardo, E. (2017). The principle of supremacy of the public interest over private interest as the foundation of Social Administrative Law. Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais - Journal of Constitutional Research, 4(2), 95-130. In https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v4i2.53437.
Galunko, V.V. (2020). Public interest in administrative law. Law Forum, 4, 181-186. In http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=FP_index.htm_2010_4_29.
Golosnichenko, D.I. (2020). Social security of citizens in the conditions of coronavirus. Legal Life of Modern Ukraine, 2, 162-165.In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/12624/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%20%D0%B6%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F%20%D1%81%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%97%20%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D0%B8%2C%202020%20%D1%80.%2C%20%D0%A2%D0%BE%D0%BC%202.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Ivashchenko, M.M. & Nazarets, D.B. (April 23, 2020). Current changes in civil relations in accordance with the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On prevention of the spread of acute respiratory disease Covid-19 in Ukraine, caused by the coronavirus SARSCoV-2”. All-Ukrainian scientific and practical online conference. Odessa: Phoenix. In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/12616.
Kashintseva, O. Y. & Trofimenko, M. M. (2020). Use of off-label drugs and unregistered drugs through the prism of intellectual property rights. In https://medcom.unba.org.ua/publications/5427-zastosuvannya-likiv-off-label-ta-nezareestrovanih-likars-kih-zasobiv-kriz-prizmu-prava-intelektualnoi-vlasnosti.html.
Kharytonova, O. I. (April 23, 2020). On the use of off-label drugs (out of instructions) and compassionate use (for reasons of humanity), COVID-19, and new opportunities and challenges in the context of intellectual property protection. All-Ukrainian scientific and practical online conference. Odesa: Phoenix. In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/12616.
Kolomiets, T. O. (2004). Administrative coercion in the public law of Ukraine: theory, experience and practice of implementation. Zaporozhye: Polygraph.
Konfudorova, L. V. (2020). The concept of “private interest” and its relationship with related legal categories. Law and society, 1(2), 26-32. DOI 10.32842/2078-3736/2020.1-2.5.
Koval, L. V. (2000). State coercion is a method of guaranteeing public safety. Legal sciences, 18, 3–7. In http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9983?show=full.
Kovalenko, S. (April, 9 2020). Quarantine: the limits of what is allowed. Pravo. In https://pravo.ua/karantin-mezhi-dozvolenogo/.
Kravets, R.Yu. (2020). Human rights interference during a pandemic. In https://protocol.ua/ua/vtruchannya_v_prava_lyudini_pid_chas_pandemii/.
Kryvorot, V. & Martynenko, A. (2020). Interference in human rights during a pandemic. In https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/vtruchannya-v-prava-lyudini-pid-chas-pandemiyi.html.
Legal Newspaper Online. (April 7, 2020). Legality of quarantine measures: conclusion of the Kharkiv Human Rights Group. In https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/zakonnist-zaprovadzhennya-karantinnih-zahodiv-visnovok-harkivskoyi-pravozahisnoyi-grupi.html.
Liga.News. (November 3, 2020). Constitutional crisis in Ukraine. In https://ua-news.liga.net/politics/video/konstitutsiyna-kriza-rada-provodit-zasidannya-translyatsiya.
Maidanyk, R.A. (2015). Reasonable proportionality and stability in determining the balance of private and public interests is the key to fair expropriation. The Supreme Court of Ukraine. In http://www.viaduk.net/clients/vsu/vsu.nsf/(print)/929B2CC50EAE6EF1C2257EE7003191E8.
Mazurenko, S. V. (2020). Intellectual property in the field of medicines in the context of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Problems of legal regulation of civil relations in terms of Covid-19, 1, 50-58. In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/12616.
McBride, J. (2020). An Analysis of Covid-19 Responses and ECHR Requirements. ECHR Blog. In http://echrblog.blogspot.com/2020/03/an-analysis-of-covid-19-responses-and.html.
N1 Belgrade (April 24, 2020). EU spokeswoman: Emergency measures must be limited. In http://rs.n1info.com/English/NEWS/a591148/EU-spokeswoman-Emergency-measures-must-be-limited.html.
Pershiy. (September 8, 2020). In Ukraine, a new anti-record was recorded in the number of deaths due to COVID-19 per day. Five Channel. In https://www.5.ua/ru/polytyka/vlast-dyletantov-poteriala-kontrol-nad-covid-19-es-trebuet-rassledovat-netselevoe-yspolzovanye-hossredstv-223522.html.
Safarov, A. (March 23, 2020). Special conditions in the country are not grounds for secrecy of socially important information. Institute of Mass Media. In https://imi.org.ua/monitorings/osoblyvi-umovy-v-krayini-ne-ye-pidstavoyu-dlya-utayemnychennya-suspilno-vazhlyvoyi-informatsiyi-i32295.
Savchenko, S. V. (2013). The ratio of private and public interests: the experience of Ukraine. Comparative and analytical law, 3(2), 53–57. In http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=FP_index.htm_2013_3_87.
Savchuk, V. (June 9, 2020). Boom of labor law. VK. In http://vkp.ua/publication/bum-na-trudove-pravo.
Schukin, O. S. (2020). Some aspects of the regulation of labor relations during the quarantine period. Legal life of modern Ukraine, 2, 173-177. In http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/12769.
Senyuta, I. (March 3, 2020a). Is there a legal restriction on quarantine under the conditions of coronavirus. Legal Newspaper Online. In https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/chi-zakonne-obmezhennya-na-karantin-za-umov-koronavirusa-2019.html.
Senyuta, I. Ya. (2020b). Processing of personal data under the new rules: protection or violation of human rights. Higher School of Advocacy. In https://www.hsa.org.ua/blog/obrobka-personalnyh-danyh-v-umovah-covid-19-zahyst-chy-porushennya-prav-lyudyny/.
Shvets, Yu. Yu. (2019). Realization of a person’s constitutional right to health care: a comparative legal study. Uzhhorod: Uzhhorod National University. In https://www.uzhnu.edu.ua/uk/infocentre/get/19675.
Silverman, Ed. (March 25, 2020). A Canadian bill would make it easier to issue compulsory licenses for Covid-19 products. Stat. In https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2020/03/25/canada-compulsory-license-coronavirus-covid19/.
Slusar, A. & Novikova, M. (May 9, 2020). Criminal Justice in Steampunk format. VK. In https://vkp.ua/ua/publication/kriminalna-yustitsiya-v-formati-steampunk.
Strauss, P. (2016). The troubling conjunction of public and private law. Comparative Law and Regulation: Understanding the Global Regulatory Process, 1, 385-402.
Syrovatskyi, V.I. (2019). Epistemological conditionality of state coercion as a motivation to comply with legal norms. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law, 4(2), 247-252. DOI 10.32844/2618-1258.2019.4-2.46.
Tikhomirov, Yu.A. (1995). Public law. Moscow: BEC. In http://www.kursach.com/biblio/0010028/000.htm.
Ukraine. (1984). Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses: Law. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10.
Ukraine. (1993). Fundamentals of the Legislation of Ukraine on Health Care. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2801-12#Text.
Ukraine. (1993). On protection of rights to inventions and utility models: Law 3687-XII. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3687-12#Text.
Ukraine. (1994). On protection of industrial design rights: Law. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3688-12#Text.
Ukraine. (2000). On protection of the population against infectious diseases: Law 1645-III. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1645-14#Text.
Ukraine. (2000). On the legal regime of the state of emergency: Law 1550-III. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1550-14#Text.
Ukraine. (2002). Criminal Code of Ukraine. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14/conv#n19.
Ukraine. (2004). Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law 1618-IV. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15.
Ukraine. (2004). On Freedom of Movement and Free Choice of Residence in Ukraine: Law. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1382-15#Text.
Ukraine. (2010). On Personal Data Protection: Law 2297-VI. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text.
Ukraine. (2011). On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine: Law. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2591-17#Text.
Ukraine. (2013). On Medicinal Products: Draft-Law. In http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/JG21K00A.html.
Ukraine. (2014). On Prevention of Corruption: Law 1700-VII. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1700-18#Text.
Ukraine. (2014). On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine: Law 794-VII. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/794-18#Text.
Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Aimed at Providing Additional Social and Economic Guarantees in Connection with the Spread of Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19): Law 540-IX. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/540-20.
Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Aimed at Preventing the Occurrence and Spread of Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19): Law 530-IX. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/530-20.
Ukraine. (2020). On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine “On Protection of the Population from Infectious Diseases” on Prevention of the Spread of Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19): Law 555-IX. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/555-20.
Ukraine. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2004). On approval of the Procedure for granting permission by the to use a patented invention (utility model): Resolution. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/8-2004-%D0%BF#Text.
Ukraine. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2020). Resolution 392. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/392-2020-%D0%BF#Text.
Ukraine. Constitutional Court of Ukraine. (2004). Decision 18-rp/2004. In https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v018p710-04#Text.
Ukraine. Judicial Power. (2020). Procedural codes are supplemented by provisions on the peculiarities of consideration of cases in the context of quarantine measures. In https://court.gov.ua/press/news/920242/.
Ukraine. Ministry of Finance. (2020). Coronavirus: statistics by country. In https://index.minfin.com.ua/reference/coronavirus/geography/.
Ukraine. Ministry of Health. (2020). On approval of the protocol “Provision of medical care for the treatment of coronavirus disease (Covid-19)”: Order 762. In https://moz.gov.ua/article/ministry-mandates/nakaz-moz-ukraini-vid-2042020--762-pro-zatverdzhennja-protokolu-nadannja-medichnoi-dopomogi-dlja-likuvannja-koronavirusnoi-hvorobi-covid-19.
Ukraine. State Juridical Administration. (2020). Operational information on the consideration of cases under Article 44-3 “Violation of the rules on human quarantine” as of June 30, 2020. In https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/pres-centr/general/962387/.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
United Nations. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
United Nations. (2020). Global solidarity to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 Covid-19: Resolution 74/270. In https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/74/270.
Varuhas, J. N. E. (2016). The Public Law-Private Law Distinction. Damages and Human Rights, 1, 167-225.
Wenzl, M. & Chapman, S. (2019). Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states. How they work and possible improvements going forward. Health Working Papers OECD, 115, 4-5. In https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/HWP-115-MEAs.pdf.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. In https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm.
Yarovyi, A. (March 24, 2020). Violations of human rights during a pandemic: where is the limit? In https://lb.ua/blog/anatolii_yarovyi/453463_porushennya_prav_lyudini_pid_chas.html.
Zaliska, O. M. & Stasiv, H.-O. I. (2019). “Managed access agreements” for innovative medicines to ensure the availability of drugs in European countries. Apteka. In https://www.apteka.ua/article/500494.
Zharovska, І.М. (2010). Public and private interests in the mechanism of modern state power. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University, 525, 33–37.
Copyright (c) 2020 Yaroslav Lazur, Tetyana Karabin, Oleksander Martyniuk, Oleksandr Bukhanevych, Oksana Kanienberh-Sandul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in our Journal comply to the following terms:
1. Authors keep their work’s copyrights, but they guarantee Ius Humani Law Journal to be the first publisher of their papers. They grant the Journal will a Creative Commons Attribution License, under which their work can be shared with the condition that it is appropriately cited.
2. Authors are aware and accept that the Ius Humani Team will try to give the greatest diffusion to the Journal, which means, among other things, that its printed and electronic editions will be distributed among different databases and scientific indexes.
3. Authors can establish further clauses for non exclusive distribution, such as publication on a separate book or placing in an institutional data-base. Nevertheless, a note should be always added to explain that the paper was originally published in Ius Humani Law Journal.
4. We permit and encourage authors to share their work through Internet before and during the editorial process to receive further recommendations and wider references (we recommend you read the article The Effect of Open Access).